Biggest blunder in my life

Did you heard that ?

?????

Do you hear a weeping sound, if so please ignore it, its me!!!!

It is because of my biggest blunder in my life….

Last week I went to native,.Sunday it was third day in our shop so I have noting left out to read so I was surfing the roads.

Across the road I saw a beautiful angel waiting for bus, but I remember her face, which is normal when ever I saw a girl in my native. But she is the beautiful girl in my memories…

Suddenly Elvis started to sing my all time favorite.

Love me tender,
Love me sweet,
Never let me go.

She noticed me then started crossing the road… Now Elvis started to sing louder

You have made my life complete,
And I love you so.
Love me Anna (brother),
Love me Anna (brother),

What???

She asked “anna, don’t you remember me I am ____(to be on safer side).your junior in school”.

Creech… kee.. aha…Creech.. boom….!!!!!(nothing just the cd player has blown away)

Now, I remember her, she is my school junior. She is the cutest sister I ever had ;-). I was not that much smart in my school times. She again started the conversation as Anna , from no where ilayaraja started to play his pathos rerecording.

Hmm, I am sure that it is my biggest blunder, accepting her as my sister.

While we were talking, her father came. I still cant forget he 3 hrs advice session when I met him first. I was answering him as 80’s Tamil hero’s English.

Cant get it?

The only answers I gave him was “yes, no and is it”. You are right, it was a nightmare. But now I cant avoid him.

As per the standards, he started the conversation with the question “what are you doing” .

With much pride I told him that I am now with EDS as a module lead.

He replied don’t you get an offer with IT legends wipro, CTS, TCS or Infosys.

What ??? ( actually WTF!)

I told him that , EDS was one of the best IT industry in the world, I even resigned my job with world’s no 1 bank and joined EDS. Now I don’t want this guy to ride over me, that too before her.

He told, May be, but only these companies are stable, even on recession these companies stood tall.

Uncle, actually speaking India was never affected by recession. India got lots of projects because of recession. even though these guys played recession drama and didn’t even pay a hike and also evaporated bench strength by showing recession as a reason. They wont pay much to their employees.

He told , even though these guys are stable than others…

How?????????

He added, even she got a marriage proposal from a guy who is working with some internet company called toogle or

I asked , is it Google!?

Yes, they told he is earning some 15 lac/annum .

Uncle, it is the best company in the world, in Hyderabad they are building a new office. They first completed employee facility even before they start their office area. This tells how they are concerned about employees.15 lakhs is a decent pay. None of the above said companies will pay like this.

May be, how long they will pay, these guys don’t have a future like wipro, CTS, TCS or Infosys.

WTF! (I cant resist it!!!)

Whatever I told, he replied may be , they are the best.

He made his point clear that , he will give his daughter only to guys who are working with those companies.

Luckily their bus came at right time, first time I am happy that the bus has came on right time when I was in a conversation with a girl. We exchanged our no’s and said goodbye.

I really don’t know what’s their problem in accepting the words of youngsters.

Guys and girls please be aware of these jerks, you please make sure you have lions share in the process of selecting your life partner.

Today I called her in the morning, she picked up the phone and told anna (ahhhhhhhhhhhha) and we were chatting for more than 3 hrs and I advised to take her own decision on selecting her life partner. She told she will select her life partner with my advice (Which is more painful).

At the end of our conversation, I asked her can we rephrase our relationship?

She told “chappals” , ilayaraja started to play his RR louder :-(

Just now realized that sunday was Valentine day..

BIO WAR ??????

"The Indian people are far better fed on average than in the past, but 2.7 million children still die in India every year, 60 percent of them from diseases linked to malnutrition (Sharma 1999). A leading cause of malnutrition in India is poverty, and in rural areas a leading cause of poverty is low productivity in agriculture. Of the nation’s one billion people, two thirds still gain their livelihood from farming, and seventy five percent of India’s farmers are disadvantaged, with one hectare of land or less (Swaminathan 1999). Meanwhile continued population growth continues to increase the burden on Indian agriculture year after year.

The productivity of Indian agriculture improved in the 1990s compared to the 1980s, as the annual rate of growth of value added in farming increased from 3.1 percent to 3.8 percent, or roughly twice the nation's rate of growth of population (World Bank 2000). Poorly managed government marketing policies occasionally generated embarrassing public stocks of food, including 27 million tons of surplus wheat at the end of 2000. Yet the impression of national food abundance was misleading. During the decade of the 1990s, total food grain production in India did not increase at all on a per capita basis, and 230 million Indians remained food-insecure due to persistent poverty, linked most often to the low productivity of their agricultural resources.

Solving India's poverty and hunger problems will require more than just a boost in farm productivity, of course. A number of other issues will also have to be addressed, including persistent rural illiteracy, social marginalization, landlessness, and caste or gender discrimination. Even where low farm productivity is the problem, GM crop technologies might not be the solution. On India's drylands, where farm productivity is low in part due to poor soil fertility or scant rainfall, the GM technologies currently in use provide few new options to address such problems. India’s poorest farmers are those that live in dryland areas with less than 750 mm of rainfall a year who lack an ability to irrigate their crops. Non-irrigated farming in India still accounts for 67 percent of total cultivated area, and supports 40 percent of the population, plus two thirds of the nation’s livestock. Average grain yields on non-irrigated land in India are only 0.7 to 0.8 tons per hectare, which is only one third the yield level on irrigated land (Singh and Venkateswarlu 1999). With yields on irrigated land now plateauing, India has little choice but to seek new technical solutions for its low-production farmers in dry, rainfed areas. In India 80 percent of millets and pulse crops are grown under rainfed conditions, and roughly 50 percent of rice is rainfed.

GM crops might seem an unlikely solution for farmers in hot drought-prone regions, since it has been far easier so far to engineer crops for specific resistances to pests or disease than to engineer the multi-gene traits needed to provide greater resistance to drought or heat. Yet India’s producers of dryland crops (such as sorghum, groundnut, or pigeon pea) also face severe pest and disease problems, along with problems such as drought or heat. For groundnuts and pigeonpea, crop losses to biotic stress are actually greater than losses to abiotic stress (ICRISAT 1992). Pigeonpea farmers can sometimes lose their entire crop through damage from a single insect. Pod borers attack all pulses, and viral diseases are a widespread blight on India's dryland crops. Small dryland cotton farmers in India are devastated by bollworm infestations. Together with conventional breeding programs and improved training in integrated pest management (IPM), genetic engineering might help provide solutions to these biotic stress problems facing India's poorest farmers."

Wow look the concern of Mr.Robert Paarlberg an ag-biotech expert article on GM crops, part of a us based MNC who is producing GM seeds.

"India’s biotech regulator Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC) had cleared Bt brinjal for regular agriculture purposes in October last year.Bt brinjal is a genetically modified brinjal developed by Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds. It has been created by inserting gene from the soil bacterium bacillus thuringiensis into brinjal, which is said to give the plant resistance against insect pests."

Maharaj Kishen Bhan, secretary, department of biotechnology said eminent scientists had examined the science behind Bt brinjal and had concluded that it was “absolutely safe for science and environment”.Bhan noted that regulation of genetically modified products was done by Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation (RCGM) and GEAC. “RCGM has 30 members. Thirty best scientists who understand science and regulation. They have cleared it and said that the data they have is sufficient to allay safety and environment concerns,” he said. “As scientists, our position is very clear that we concur with the decision of RCGM and GEAC about safety and health issues,”

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research director general Samir Brahmachari said "farmers will benefit from the use of genetically modified brinjal.He said every year brinjal crop worth over Rs 1,000 crore is lost to insect attacks."

Why lots of noise on BT brinjal, didn’t Monsanto and Mahyco paid the opposing parties well?

They should have learnt the approach from their counter part who used India as a test ground for GM cotton.

Did any one of you know that GM crops are already in India, this is not the first of its case.

Later in 2004 GM cotton was introduced in India, On 03/05/06 a report was issued by ISIS

"At least 1 820 sheep were reported dead after grazing on post-harvest Bt cotton crops; the symptoms and post-mortem findings strongly suggest they died from severe toxicity.This latest report confirms the findings of an earlier fact-finding investigation, also conducted by civil society organisations, on illnesses in cotton farm workers and handlers caused by Bt cotton in another cotton-growing state, Madhya Pradesh, in India And not so long ago.

Grazing lands in Warangal district have declined steeply as commercial crop cultivation expanded in recent years, and it has become customary for sheep and goats to be allowed to graze on crop residues after harvest.

This year, there have been several media reports of sharp increases in the deaths of sheep and goats after grazing in Bt cotton fields. There were similar reports in 2005, when complaints were lodged with the Joint Director of Agriculture by a few NGOs, but no action has resulted.

The Ippagudem village in Ghanapur mandal has 100 households belonging to the shepherd community. Forty shepherds and ten farmers attended the group meeting when the team visited. They said the deaths began after their sheep grazed on Bt cotton leaves or bolls. This year was the first time some of the shepherds and farmers cultivated Bt cotton hybrids, believing in the propaganda that they can get more yield and profit. They started grazing from the end of January to March. The deaths began within a week of continuous grazing on the Bt cotton crop residues. Mr. J. Parmesh, one of the shepherds got diarrhoea after consuming the affected sheep's meat."

Its cool na?

Let me come to the technology behind the BT. Bt toxins are derived from the soil bacterium Bacillus thuringenesis. The actual process is injecting gene of BT into brinjal. Which in term help the brinjal to resist against insects. Actually speaking as bacteria is a parasite this process happens by nature itself. But not on all the plants. That is reason for most of the peoples are allergic to brinjal.

My actual concern is, a business man who is claiming a patent for a process which is already happening by nature. You many ask what’s the issue.We allow BT brinjal , it will bring lots of gain to farmers. As the world is running behind money, all the farmers will start to use this. After some time other variants of brinjal will be out of market like the natural manures.

On that time those MNC will control the cost of food items in India, do we expect this? The so called independence will be only in papers.

There is one more serious background for this, I see this as a BIO WAR on India. How????????

As most of you have studied about pollination. There are two types of pollination one is self and other is cross . Not all the plants and trees are capable of doing self pollination. Most of the plants need help of natures genetic engineers (insects) for pollination.

By introducing these kind of crops we are not only killing the insects which are damaging the crops but also the insects which are helping plants for pollination. with out pollination there is no more fruits, seeds. we need to relay on crops which are capable of self pollination. At that time it will be only GM crops and all are patent controlled.And also they will be selling the pollination techniques.

Be aware , Be ready for a BIO WAR.

Supreme power of "Great India"

The four main pillars of Indian democracy are legislative, judiciary, media and citizens. As of now all the four pillars are rotten, which paves the way for anarchy in future. In the above four, judiciary has extreme powers while comparing to others three. Because other three are answerable to judiciary, but judiciary is not.

The Supreme Court of India:

The Supreme Court of India is known for using its constitutional mandate and authority to initiate actions in the public interest. The court in the past has even taken note of newspaper reports to initiate actions against suspected breach of law and misuse of office by public servants. This earnestness and enthusiasm have not been reflected in the Indian courts' approach in scrutinizing the activities of the courts and their judges, however. On the contrary, the Indian courts have been very parochial in facing criticism.

Previously INDIAN JUDICIARY was the angel who provides justice to the commoners. Now, the tentacles of corruption have engulfed the Indian judiciary too. There are charges against various judges ranging from bribery, theft; practice of untouchability, false affidavit to murder .One judge has been accused of literally running an AUCTION HOUSE OF JUDICIAL ORDERS in association with the underworld. In that place everything from BAIL; STAY TO ACQUITTAL FROM CASE was available for a price of course.

Some of the pioneering efforts of media have brought these scandals light .the judiciary has hidden those scandals in a hush hush manner from the public eye. Recently it was reported in “deccan herald “that a district judge of u.p. was acting as a pimp since years & supplying mod girls to politicians. In another report it was stated that a district judge of tamilnadu demanded sexual favors from a woman to give favorable judgment in a case when she refused to do his bidding he allegedly tried to rape her. Quite recently, there was a news report about immoral acts of certain high ranking judges in a resort near Mysore. It was indirectly implied that certain women advocates who were selected as judges were returning the favors immorally to the senior judges (who were in the selection committee).

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court of India was found locked in a battle with the legislature regarding the issue of transparency of the judiciary. The court that once said the newly implemented right to information law was a necessity in India to bring light into the dark corners of administration, is becoming increasingly wary about the same principles applied to the courts. This attitude is an extension of the Supreme Court's earlier “allergy” toward bringing transparency into the Indian judiciary. In 2007 the court forced Vijay Shekhar – a journalist with a television news channel who exposed the caucus of a corrupt magistrate, his court staff and some lawyers in Gujarat state in a "warrants for cash" scam – to apologize to the court or face a term in jail for contempt of court. The court staff and lawyers were caught on camera negotiating and accepting bribes for the magistrate for issuing arrest warrants.

The Supreme Court took up the matter and directed the Gujarat High Court to initiate an internal enquiry against the concerned judicial officer and his staff. The Gujarat High Court absolved the judge, however, without examining the complainants. Thereafter, the Supreme Court of India condemned the journalist who had carried out this operation and threatened to send him to jail for contempt unless he apologized. The conviction and sentencing of journalists in 2007 for publishing information about the conduct of Justice Sabharwal, a Supreme Court judge, had brought to the fore the issue of judicial accountability. But the issue soon died a natural death, since no one wanted to get into trouble with the court.

The Indian judiciary is one of the most powerful in the world. Its conduct has a direct impact upon the life of ordinary people. A state institution of such high powers must be transparent and accountable for its actions. The courts in India have however consistently avoided calls for accountability despite many serious allegations of misconduct and misdemeanor. At one time Justice S. P. Bharucha, the former chief justice of India, admitted that about 20 percent of the higher judiciary was corrupt. According to Justice Michael Saldahna of the Karnataka High Court, it is 33 percent. Despite such admissions, no enquiry has ever been initiated against any judge in the past 15 years.

Under the Constitution of India, the only way to remove a judge from the High Court or the Supreme Court is by way of impeachment. This constitutional provision has failed miserably. Its ineffectiveness was clearly demonstrated in the case of Justice V. Ramaswami. At the same time, despite verbal homilies, the courts and judges have been the most reluctant to evolve even a self-monitoring mechanism for accountability. Such a situation reflects enormous arrogance and abuse of power. This is reflected in the procedures for appointing judges to the higher judiciary as well. Even though appointments are made by the president of India, the selection is made by the collegiums of judges. The selection process is nontransparent and all attempts to make the process transparent have been resisted by the judiciary.

Demanding judicial accountability has almost always caused the initiation of contempt proceedings, thereby stifling free discussion on the issues that plague the judiciary. Unwarranted use of contempt of court proceedings in fact diminishes the public perception about the judiciary's openness and transparency.

The term democracy implies the notion that the people are supreme. All state institutions, whether it is the judiciary, legislature or the executive, are merely servants of the people. The basic principle behind the contempt of court proceedings is that the court must use this authority only in circumstances where otherwise the functioning of the court would be impossible or obstructed.

In India under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the term “contempt” is not defined. Therefore if any person makes adverse comments against the court or a judge, the power to punish for "scandalizing the court” is frequently invoked. As per the law, court can even file charges against me for this post. Thank god, our judges are not good at internet.

This approach is considered obscure in most established jurisdictions. The contempt of court action must not be an attempt to protect the dignity of the court, but to promote the administration of justice. The dignity of the court is promoted by the court being humble enough to face criticism, whereas promotion of justice is to be carried out by removing all hindrances to the delivery of justice. By the unrestrained use of contempt of court actions the courts in India are in fact derogating from their duty to safeguard the Constitution of the country, which also guarantees freedom of speech and expression in Article 19 (1).

The honor of the judges and the judiciary – the state institution through which the judges are supposed to serve the people – is promoted and protected by the openness of the judges and the judiciary to criticism. Intolerance to scrutiny and lack of openness equates the judges and the judiciary with a dictatorship. At this pace the Indian judiciary, once known for its eloquence and its contribution to the advancement of free thought and expression, will soon be reduced to an egotistical institution. Such a judiciary is definitely not what modern India aspires to. India today requires a transparent, accountable and sensitive judiciary.

The imperatives for the judiciary in India are obvious. It has a duty to protect, promote and fulfill the Constitutional guarantees. The judiciary must be open and transparent with a clear conscience that it is not beyond criticism. For this, it must be accountable to the people, which it is bound to serve. The judiciary in India is the last hope of a fragmented society. When it fails to respect its responsibilities, it will bring insurmountable peril to the country and its people.

India’s subordinate courts have a backlog of over 22 million cases while the 21 high courts and the Supreme Court have 3.5 million and 32,000 pending cases (2006). In subordinate courts, over 15 million cases are filed and an equal number disposed of annually by about 14,000 judges! Every year a million or more cases are added to the arrears. At the current speed, the lower courts may take 124 years for clearing the backlog. There were only 13 judges for every million people.

According to the National Crime Records Bureau, only 31 per cent criminal trials are completed in less than a year. Some take even more than 10 years. According to its study, Crime in India 2002, nearly 220,000 cases took more than 3 years to reach court, and about 25,600 exhausted 10 years before they were completed. The term of the Liberhan Commission, formed 14 years ago to probe the demolition of the Babar mosque in Ayodhya and originally given a mandate of three months, has been extended again!

Because of this Most of the cases are lossing their importance.When the case comes for hearing he might have forget the incident itself, which helps the oponent lawyer to break the points.

Finally judiciary made one point clear to ordinary peoples, i.e don’t come to me for justice, I will provide a crap that to after a long time. So don’t indulge in any activates which may need judiciary assistance. Which it term helps the rouges to attain their task, with out any issues. So after the breaking point we find only rouges not citizens.

Scandals against judges:

1949: Mr. Justice Sinha only Judge impeached; courtesy Good Judges & Constitution Framers: Our Fore-Fathers represented by Constituent Assembly of India framers of Constitution of India then in 1949 (year before Constitution came into existence) impeached Mr. Justice Sinha; finding him "guilty of improper exercise of Judicial functions, the cumulative effect of which was to lower the dignity of his office and undermine the confidence of the public in the administration of justice. Such similar acts behaviors by whom-so-ever including Judges are since 1971 is covered as an act of Criminal Contempt of Court [041.05]. Not a single Judge is either Impeached or hauled-up for Contempt till 1991.

Peoples' Inner Hope Courts to maintain their Majesty & Dignity will prosecute 1000 Judges in context, who have tarnished & undermined the Fair image of Judiciary. Let Judges relish Jail for months if not years, to asses personally the conveniences-N-comforts provided even to innocent citizens or persons who were not having Rs. 100 to give as Bail. Then they will be in better position to Transform Jails into Reformation Centers. Jailing corrupt Judges by Judges, we hope will instill confidence of people in Courts & law. Who-is-who of India then only will scare
to get into any scam or Criminals will think of becoming Legislators.

1979 : Chief Justice Mr. K. Veeraswami ; Chief Justice of India permitted Central Bureau of India to file case of Dis-proportionate of Income / wealth against Chief Justice Madras High Court Mr. K. Veeraswami ( father-in-law of Mr. Justice V. Ramaswami ). 30 years elapsed. Sheltered by Courts' easy-go-tactic. [049.04] [059.05]

1991-93: Mr. Justice V. Ramaswami (son-in-law of Chief Justice Mr. K. Veeraswami [049.04]): SAWANT COMMITTEE REPORT had held he is guilty of several charges. Supreme Court of India also upheld guilty of 3-4 charges & recommended to Parliament for further action. Parliamentarians failed in their Duty to Impeach the Sitting Judge of Supreme Court Mr. Justice V. Ramaswami; not rising to the Heights of Eminent Constitution makers; but chose to have unholy alliance with Corruption in Judiciary vis-à-vis Legislature & Government.[008.00 ].

Supreme Court which upheld Charges of Misbehavior also , we opine , failed to prosecute him under Contempt of Court Act & relevant Laws . It also failed “To Do Complete Justice" by invoking Article142. Criminal Judge was allowed to go scot-free; both by Parliament & Supreme Court!

Good precedent for other Judges? If so what kind of message to we-innocent-Citizens? For almost complete proceedings in SC & Parliament: [008.00 ] 1995 A.M. BHATTACHARJEE: The chief justice of the Bombay High Court was forced to resign in 1995 after it was found that he had received Rs.70 lakhs as book advance from a publishing firm known to have links with the underworld.

1996 AJIT SENGUPTA: The Calcutta High Court judge made it a routine to issue ex parte, ad interim stay orders on anticipatory bail pleas from smugglers having links with the Mumbai underworld. He was arrested in 1996 for FERA violations after retirement

1994 to 1997: A.M. AHMADI: When he was Chief Justice of India (October 1994-March 1997), his daughter, a lawyer in the Delhi High Court, caused eyebrows to be raised for getting "special" treatment from certain judges. When some members of the bar sought a resolution banning lawyer relatives of judges from staying in the same house, the CJI got members to defeat the motion.

2000 A.S. ANAND: As Chief Justice of India. (a) He was accused of using his position to get the subordinate judiciary to rule in favor of his wife and mother-in-law in a suit that had been barred by limitation for two decades. Also read Ram Jethmalani's “BIG EGOS, small men ". (b) Supreme Court, while he was CJI, directed a CBI probe after a dispute arose over his age in 2000. The investigation report was not made public. This arose due to scan copy published in Ram Jethmalani's “BIG EGOS, small men ".

2002: SEX FOR ACQUITTAL In November 2002, Sunita Malviya, a Jodhpur-based doctor, alleged that a deputy registrar of the Rajasthan High Court had sought sexual favors for himself and for Justice Arun Madan to "fix" a case in her favor. Justice Mr. Arun Madan. Case of Lady Sunita Malviya.
STATUS: A committee set up by former CJI G.B. Pattanaik found prima facie evidence against Madan, who does not attend court anymore. Judge Resigned

CASH-FOR-JOB: Three judges of the Punjab and Haryana High Court sought the help of disgraced PPSC chief R.P. Sidhu to ensure that their daughters and other kin topped examinations conducted by the commission. Judges are M.L. Singh, Mehtab Sing Gill & Amarbir Singh
STATUS: Two inquiry panels indicted the judges. Gill and Amarbir Singh have resigned M.L. Singh continues, though no work is allotted to him.

2002-03: 3 Judges Mysore Sex Scandal ( alleged ) : On Sunday, November 3, 2002, three judges of the Karnataka High Court, along with two women advocates, allegedly got involved in a brawl with a woman guest at a resort. The police arrived but reportedly didn't take action. Judges are N.S. Veerabhadraiah, V. Gopalagowda & A.Chandrashekaraiah .
STATUS: The three-judge inquiry committee appointed by the CJI filed its report. Gave a clean chit.

March 2003 - Delhi High Court Judge resigns: Suspected of collusion with Property Developers. Raids by CBI on corrupt higher officials in Delhi Development Authority (DDA), found Draft Judgment-N-Court Records

Honorables Sir's, First of all try to solve the cases against you with transperency.Then you can provide justice to the peoples.